Logo of National Eczema Association mobile menu icon
Icon link to National Eczema's Instagram feed. Icon link to National Eczema's YouTube channel. Icon link to National Eczema's Facebook page. Icon link to National Eczema's Twitter feed. Icon link to National Eczema's inspire.com page. Search Icon to search the site

Get the tools and support you need to best manage your eczema

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sun Exposure and Eczema: Does Reduced UV-B Exposure Contribute to an Increase in Atopic Dermatitis?

Could insufficient exposure to sunlight be contributing to the current atopic dermatitis epidemic?

Sun Exposure and Eczema: Does Reduced UV-B Exposure Contribute to an Increase in Atopic Dermatitis?

The recent epidemic of atopic disorders, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis (AD), is associated with the shift of human populations from life in a largely rural, agrarian society to ever-more crowded, urban settings.

While there is no doubt that rural life is protective, the usual explanation for the “immune hypothesis” may not be completely correct. This theory suggests that rural children get exposed early in life to microorganisms and antigens that induce immune tolerance, protecting them from developing the characteristic Th2-dominant (allergic- type) inflammation that is seen in most patients with AD.

But the shift from a rural to a more crowded, urban environment is associated not only with less exposure to tolerance-inducing, environmental antigens, but also a dramatic decrease in sun exposure. The studies that support this new paradigm are included in this article’s references for those who want to explore this subject in greater depth.

It seems obvious that children living in urban settings receive much less light than do their rural counterparts. Recent work from Korea has shown that moderate (suberythemal) doses of UV-B, which do not burn the skin, improve barrier function and antimicrobial defense (note: higher, sunburn-inducing doses, however, exert an opposite, deleterious effect). In fact, much of the evidence for the immune hypothesis can be explained instead by differences in sun exposure in rural vs. urban populations.

Moreover, moderate doses of UV-B irradiation could provide several other benefits for patients with AD, which are illustrated in Figure 1. For example, UV-B stimulates vitamin D production in the skin, which is beneficial not only for the barrier, but also for antimicrobial defense (vitamin D stimulates the production of an important antimicrobial peptide, LL-37, which combats skin infections).

Patients with AD experience problems with both their permeability barriers and antimicrobial defense, and problems with the barrier appear to be the underlying cause of AD, regardless of the specific gene that is mutated (filaggrin is only one of several that are now associated with AD).

My colleague, Dr. Jacob Thyssen (of Copenhagen, Denmark) and I wrote a Perspective article for the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In this article, we summarize evidence in support of this new hypothesis; i.e., that an insufficiency of exposure to moderate UV-B irradiation could be a major contributor to the current AD epidemic.

But most importantly for AD patients are the therapeutic implications; during late spring, summer and early autumn, regular exposure to moderate doses of sunlight could provide large benefits for AD patients. (To receive the benefits of UV-B, exposure should be in midday, or at least between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.). Since very little UV-B makes it through the atmosphere during late fall, winter and early spring, regular light treatments in a doctor’s office, or with a home light box should be considered.

Dr. Peter Elias photoDr. Elias is Professor (Emeritus) of Dermatology at UC San Francisco, and a Staff Physician at the San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center. His laboratory is located at the new UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay. Dr. Elias earned his undergraduate degree at Stanford University and then went to UCSF Medical School, followed by a dermatology residency in the Harvard-Massachusetts General Hospital program.

 


References

  1. R. S. Dawe, “Ultraviolet A1 Phototherapy,” British Journal of Dermatology 148 (2003): 626–37.
  2. S. P. Hong, M. J. Kim, M. Y. Jung, et al, “Biopositive effects of low-dose UVB on epidermis: coordinate upregulation of antimicrobial peptides and permeability barrier reinforcement,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 128 (2008): 2880–7.
  3. A. M. Farrell, Y. Uchida, M. M. Nagiec, et al, “UVB irradiation up-regulates serine palmitoyltransferase in cultured human keratinocytes,” Journal of Lipid Research 39 (1998): 2031–8.
  4. J. Jekler, I. M. Bergbrant, J. Faergemann, et al, “The in vivo effect of UVB radiation on skin bacteria in patients with atopic dermatitis,” Acta Dermato- Venereology 72 (1992): 33–6.
  5. M. Yoshimura, S. Namura, H. Akamatsu, et al, “Antimicrobial effects of phototherapy and photochemotherapy in vivo and in vitro,” British Journal of Dermatology 135 (1996): 528–32.
  6. M. Yoshimura-Mishima, H. Akamatsu, S. Namura, et al, “Suppressive effect of ultraviolet (UVB and PUVA) radiation on superantigen production by Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Dermatological Science 19 (1999): 31–6.
  7. J. Wallengren and F. Sundler, “Phototherapy reduces the number of epidermal and CGRP-positive dermal nerve fibres,” Acta Dermato-Venereology 84 (2004): 111–5.
  8. J. Schauber, R. A. Dorschner, A. B. Coda, et al, “Injury enhances TLR2 function and antimicrobial peptide expression through a vitamin D-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 117 (2007): 803–11.
  9. J. Schauber, Y. Oda, A. S. Buchau, et al, “Histone acetylation in keratinocytes enables control of the expression of cathelicidin and CD14 by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 128 (2008): 816–24.
  10. M. M. Suarez-Varela, L. Garcia-Marcos Alvarez, M. D. Kogan, et al, “Climate and prevalence of atopic eczema in 6- to 7-year-old school children in Spain. ISAAC phase III,” International Journal of Biometeorology 52 (2008): 833–40.
  11. J. I. Silverberg, J. Hani n, and E. L. Simpson, “Climatic factors are associated with childhood eczema prevalence in the United States,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 133 (2013): 1752–9, 3646081.
  12. K. Kuzume and M. Kusu, “Before-birth climatologic data may play a role in the development of allergies in infants,” Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 18 (2007): 281–7.
  13. M. E. Schram, A. M. Tedja, R. Spijker, et al, “Is there a rural/urban gradient in the prevalence of eczema? A systematic review,” British Journal of Dermatology 162 (2010): 964–73.
  14. I. Synnerstad, L. Nilsson, M. Fredrikson, et al, “Frequency and distribution pattern of melanocytic naevi in Swedish 8- to 9-year-old children,” 84 Acta Dermato-Venereology 84 (2004): 271–6.
  15. M. Kallas, I. Rosdahl, M. Fredriksson, et al, “Frequency and distribution pattern of melanocytic naevi in Estonian children and the influence of atopic dermatitis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 20 (2006): 143–8.

Topics in this Article

Latest Articles

Related posts